Characterizing weak compactness

DOI10.1016/0168-0072(84)90043-5MaRDI QIDQ793718zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Lee J. Stanley

Publication date 1984

Published in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(84)90043-5

zbMATH Keywords

supercompact cardinalweakly compact cardinalEaston forcingGeneric extensionsSouslin's hypothesisstationary reflection property

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55)

Recommendations

• Weakly compact cardinals in models of set theory
• Weak compactness and no partial squares
• Strong compactness and stationary sets
• The weakly compact reflection principle need not imply a high order of weak compactness
• Characterizing strong compactness via strongness

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3731799 (Why is no real title available?)
• Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
• Saturated ideals
• The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy

Cited in

(3)

• Strongly unfoldable, splitting and bounding
• Knaster and friends II: The C-sequence number
• Weak compactness and no partial squares

This page was built for publication: Characterizing weak compactness

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q793718)