Quasitransitive rationalization and the superset property
\textit{G. Bordes, D. H. Blair, J. S. Kelly} and \textit{K. Suzumura} [J. Econ. Theory 13, 361-379 (1976; Zbl 0361.90005)] assumed that the choice correspondence has a domain which includes all nonempty finite subsets of the universal set of alternatives. They also take the superset property to be a necessary condition for a choice correspondence to have a quasitransitive rationalization. The author presents an example of a choice correspondence which satisfies the domain condition mentioned above and has a quasitransitive rationalization but does not satisfy the superset property. Then, two restrictions on the domain of the choice correspondence are introduced, either of which is sufficient to make the superset property a necessary condition for quasitransitive rationality.
- Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3891357
- On transversals of quasialgebraic families of sets
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4188101
- Quantale-valued sup-algebras
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5224756
- Transitive quasi-uniformities and topogenous orders
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5138775
- Properties of quasiary specification algebras
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3876182
- Choice Functions and Revealed Preference
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3976693 (Why is no real title available?)
- Impossibility theorems without collective rationality
- Path Independence, Rationality, and Social Choice
- Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination
- Some Further Results on Consistency, Rationality and Collective Choice
This page was built for publication: Quasitransitive rationalization and the superset property
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q798241)
