The elementary theory of the recursively enumerable degrees is not \(\aleph _ 0\)-categorical
From MaRDI portal
Publication:802550
DOI10.1016/0001-8708(84)90028-8zbMath0559.03027OpenAlexW2091246156MaRDI QIDQ802550
Robert I. Soare, Manuel Lerman, Richard A. Shore
Publication date: 1984
Published in: Advances in Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(84)90028-8
Recursively (computably) enumerable sets and degrees (03D25) Other degrees and reducibilities in computability and recursion theory (03D30) Categoricity and completeness of theories (03C35)
Related Items
The ∀∃-theory of ℛ(≤,∨,∧) is undecidable, Towards characterizing the \(> \omega^2\)-fickle recursively enumerable Turing degrees, Some aspects of effectively constructive mathematics that are relevant to the foundations of neoclassical mathematical economics and the theory of games, Undecidability and 1-types in the recursively enumerable degrees, Annual Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic, Berkeley, 1990, Turing computability: structural theory, Model-theoretic properties of Turing degrees in the Ershov difference hierarchy, Lattice embeddings into the recursively enumerable degrees. II, Degree Structures: Local and Global Investigations, The density of the nonbranching degrees, Undecidability and 1-types in intervals of the computably enumerable degrees
Cites Work