Are all linear paired comparison models empirically equivalent?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:807397)
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3152611 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3814037 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41025 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3318338 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3073477 (Why is no real title available?)
- A continuum of paired comparisons models
- A paired comparison of pair comparisons
- A random utility family that includes many of the ‘classical’ models and has closed form choice probabilities and choice reaction times
- Composition rules for probabilities from paired comparisons
- Majorization, entropy and paired comparisons
- Multidimensional quantification of the data obtained by the method of paired comparison
- Multivariate paired comparisons: The extension of a univariate model and associated estimation and test procedures
- Probability models on rankings
- Remarks about a paired comparison model
- Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons
- The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thurstone's theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution
Cited in
(6)- Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances
- Aggregation of preferences by the generalized row sum method
- A dynamic paired comparisons model: who is the greatest tennis player?
- Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups
- Incomplete paired comparisons in case of multiple choice and general log-concave probability density functions
- Masking data: a solution to social desirability bias in paired comparison experiments
This page was built for publication: Are all linear paired comparison models empirically equivalent?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q807397)
