An investigation of geometric nonlinear formulations for 3D beam elements

DOI10.1016/0020-7462(90)90004-SMaRDI QIDQ808765zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors N. E. Zubov

Publication date 1990

Published in International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7462(90)90004-s

zbMATH Keywords

discretizationconvergencecomputation timesolution stabilitymildly nonlinearcablestayed bridgescombination of linear and first order geometric stiffness matricesguyed towershighly nonlinear situationslarge span roofs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonlinear elasticity (74B20) Rods (beams, columns, shafts, arches, rings, etc.) (74K10) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05)

Recommendations

• Geometrically nonlinear formulation of 3D finite strain beam element with large rotations
• A consistent co-rotational formulation for nonlinear, three-dimensional, beam-elements
• Corotational total Lagrangian formulation for three-dimensional beamelement
• Geometrically non‐linear formulation for three dimensional curved beam elements with large rotations
• A three-dimensional beam element undergoing finite rotations based on slopes and distance measures

Cited in

(9)

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 56338 (Why is no real title available?)
• The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shell. III: The three-dimensional beam theory and the FE formulation
• A comparison of finite elements for nonlinear beams: the absolute nodal coordinate and geometrically exact formulations
• Variable order secant matrix technique applied to the elastic postbuckling of arches
• A co-rotational updated Lagrangian formulation for a 2D beam element with consideration of the deformed curvature
• The finite deformation theory for beam, plate and shell. I: The two-dimensional beam theory
• Geometric nonlinear analysis of angle section elements based on updated Lagrangian formulation and rigid body rule
• A three‐dimensional non‐linear Timoshenko beam based on the core‐congruential formulation
• Equilibrium considerations of the updated Lagrangian formulation of beam-columns with natural concepts

This page was built for publication: An investigation of geometric nonlinear formulations for 3D beam elements

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q808765)