On indecomposable and non-decomposable quadratic forms

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:809120)





In the present paper the following two theorems are proved. Theorem 2.1: If the positive definite quadratic form f(X) over \({\mathbb{Z}}\) is unimodular, then f(X) is non-decomposable if and only it is indecomposable. Theorem 2.2: For any natural number n there exists an n- ary non-decomposable positive definite unimodular quadratic form over \({\mathbb{Z}}\) but for the following ten exceptions: \(n=2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13\). In these exceptional cases, there are no forms with the desired properties. Here some words for the terminologies: \({\mathbb{Z}}\) is the ring of rational integers. The quadratic form \(f(X)=f(X_ 1,...,X_ n)=\sum^{n}_{i,j=1}a_{ij}X_ iX_ j,\quad a_{ij}=a_{ji}\in {\mathbb{Z}}\) which is positive definite, is called non-decomposable if there is no expression of the type \(f(X)=g(X)+h(X)\) with g(X) and h(X) non- negative over \({\mathbb{Z}}\). A quadratic form f(X) is called indecomposable if the lattice L associated with f(X) does not admit an orthogonal splitting \(L=P\perp R\) into two non-zero sublattices. The latter theorem is already obtained by previous papers (including one by the present author), but the proof in the present paper is largely shortened.











This page was built for publication: On indecomposable and non-decomposable quadratic forms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q809120)