Typicality in the foundations of statistical physics and Born's rule
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:822473)
Abstract: Typicality has always been in the minds of the founding fathers of probability theory when probabilistic reasoning is applied to the real world. However, the role of typicality is not always appreciated. An example is the paper "Foundations of statistical mechanics and the status of Born's rule in de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave theory" by Antony Valentini, where he presents typicality and relaxation to equilibrium as distinct approaches to the proof of Born's rule, while typicality is in fact an overriding necessity. Moreover the "typicality approach" to Born's rule of "the Bohmian mechanics school" is claimed to be inherently circular. We wish to explain once more in very simple terms why the accusation is off target and why "relaxation to equilibrium" is neither necessary nor sufficient to justify Born's rule.
Recommendations
- Typicality vs. Probability in trajectory-based formulations of quantum mechanics
- Probability and typicality in deterministic physics
- Justifying typicality measures of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics and dynamical systems
- Statistical origin of quantum mechanics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3960730
- Born's rule from classical random fields
- The Born rule as a statistics of quantum micro-events
- Statistical origin of classical mechanics and quantum mechanics
- Quantum-mechanical statistics and the inclusivist approach to the nature of particulars
- On typicality in nonequilibrium steady states
Cited in
(6)- Probability and typicality in deterministic physics
- Beyond the Born rule in quantum gravity
- Justifying typicality measures of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics and dynamical systems
- Relaxation to quantum equilibrium and the Born rule in Nelson's stochastic dynamics
- Probability as typicality
- Born's rule in multiqubit Bohmian systems
This page was built for publication: Typicality in the foundations of statistical physics and Born's rule
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q822473)