On a theorem by de Felipe and Teissier about the comparison of two henselisations in the non-Noetherian case

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:827052)



Abstract: Let R be a local domain, v a valuation of its quotient field centred in R at its maximal ideal. We investigate the relationship between R^h, the henselisation of R as local ring, and {~v}, the henselisation of the valuation v, by focussing on the recent result by de Felipe and Teissier referred to in the title. We give a new proof that simplifies the original one by using purely algebraic arguments. This proof is moreover constructive in the sense of Bishop and previous work of the authors, and allows us to obtain as a by-product a (slight) generalisation of the theorem by de Felipe and Teissier.


Modulo a slight generalisation, the authors of this paper give a simple and constructive proof of the following theorem of \textit{A. B. de Felipe} and \textit{B. Teissier} [Math. Ann. 377, No. 3--4, 935--967 (2020; Zbl 1451.12005)]. Let \(R\) be a local domain and let \(R^h\) be its henselisation. If \(v\) is a valuation centred in \(R\), then: (1) There exists a unique prime ideal \(H(v)\) of \(R^h\) lying over the zero ideal of \(R\) such that \(v\) extends to a valuation \(\tilde v\) centred in \(R^h/H(v)\) through the inclusion \(R\subseteq R^h/H(v)\). In addition, the ideal \(H(v)\) is a minimal prime and the extension \(\tilde v\) is unique. (2) With the notations of (1), the valuations \(v\) and \(\tilde v\) have the same value group.











This page was built for publication: On a theorem by de Felipe and Teissier about the comparison of two henselisations in the non-Noetherian case

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q827052)