On the classification between -ontic and -epistemic ontological models

DOI10.1007/S10701-020-00377-XzbMATH Open1451.81012arXiv2006.05853OpenAlexW3083749242WikidataQ103836894 ScholiaQ103836894MaRDI QIDQ828366FDOQ828366

Cristian López, Andrea Oldofredi

Publication date: 8 January 2021

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Harrigan and Spekkens (2010) provided a categorization of quantum ontological models classifying them as $psi$-ontic or $psi$-epistemic if the quantum state describes respectively either a physical reality or mere observers' knowledge. Moreover, they claimed that Einstein - who was a supporter of the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics - endorsed an epistemic view of $psi$. In this essay we critically assess such a classification and some of its consequences by proposing a two-fold argumentation. Firstly, we show that Harrigan and Spekkens' categorization implicitly assumes that a complete description of a quantum system (its ontic state, $lambda$) only concerns single, individual systems instantiating absolute, intrinsic properties. Secondly, we argue that such assumptions conflict with some current interpretations of quantum mechanics, which employ different ontic states as a complete description of quantum systems. In particular, we will show that, since in the statistical interpretation ontic states describe ensembles rather than individuals, such a view cannot be considered psi-epistemic. As a consequence, the authors misinterpreted Einstein's view concerning the nature of the quantum state. Next, we will focus on Relationalist Quantum Mechanics and Perspectival Quantum Mechanics, which in virtue of their relational and perspectival metaphysics employ ontic states lambda dealing with relational properties. We conclude that Harrigan and Spekkens' categorization is too narrow and entails an inadequate classification of the mentioned interpretations of quantum theory. Hence, any satisfactory classification of quantum ontological models ought to take into account the variations of $lambda$ across different interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05853

zbMATH Keywords

completenessrelational quantum mechanicsincompletenessepistemic quantum statesperspectival quantum mechanicsstatistical interpretation of quantum mechanics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Physics (00A79) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)

Cites Work

• Relational quantum mechanics
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
• Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states
• The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Quantum Theory of Measurement
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Quantum Worlds
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics
• The Emergent Multiverse
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Essential Quantum Mechanics
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On peaceful coexistence: is the collapse postulate incompatible with relativity?
• Objectivity in perspective: relationism in the Interpretation of quantum mechanics
• The Meaning of the Wave Function
• What is Quantum Information?

Cited In (7)

• Is the statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics \(\psi\)-ontic or \(\psi\)-epistemic?
• Relational quantum mechanics and the PBR theorem: a peaceful coexistence
• Can the ontology of Bohmian mechanics consists only in particles? The PBR theorem says no
• How real are quantum states in \(\psi \)-ontic models?
• States vs. changes of states: a reformulation of the ontic vs. epistemic distinction in quantum mechanics
• On the reality of the quantum state once again: a no-go theorem for \(\psi\)-ontic models
• Could wavefunctions simultaneously represent knowledge and reality?

This page was built for publication: On the classification between \(\psi \)-ontic and \(\psi \)-epistemic ontological models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q828366)