Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

DOI10.1016/J.CSDA.2020.107068OpenAlexW3053496036MaRDI QIDQ830593FDOQ830593

Authors: Tsubasa Ito, Shonosuke Sugasawa 

Publication date: 7 May 2021

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08428

Recommendations

• Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds
• Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: Comparison of different approaches
• Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds using survival methods
• A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
• A population‐averaged approach to diagnostic test meta‐analysis
• Alternative confidence interval methods used in the diagnostic accuracy studies
• On composite likelihood in bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
• A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard

zbMATH Keywords

asymptotic expansionrandom-effects modelbias correctionconfidence region

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites Work

• An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown
• A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
• Improved Small Sample Inference in the Mixed Linear Model: Bartlett Correction and Adjusted Likelihood
• A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta‐Analysis
• A matrix‐based method of moments for fitting the multivariate random effects model for meta‐analysis and meta‐regression
• Permutation inference methods for multivariate meta‐analysis

Cited In (5)

• Confidence interval for normal means in meta-analysis based on a pretest estimator
• Meta‐analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Assessment Studies with Varying Number of Thresholds
• A population‐averaged approach to diagnostic test meta‐analysis
• Erratum
• Alternative confidence interval methods used in the diagnostic accuracy studies

This page was built for publication: Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q830593)