Stability of quadratic modules

From MaRDI portal
Publication:834811



Abstract: A finitely generated quadratic module or preordering in the real polynomial ring is called stable, if it admits a certain degree bound on the sums of squares in the representation of polynomials. Stability, first defined explicitly by Powers and Scheiderer, is a very useful property. It often implies that the quadratic module is closed; furthermore it helps settling the Moment Problem, solves the Membership Problem for quadratic modules and allows applications of methods from optimization to represent nonnegative polynomials. We provide sufficient conditions for finitely generated quadratic modules in real polynomial rings of several variables to be stable. These conditions can be checked easily. For a certain class of semi-algebraic sets, we obtain that the nonexistence of bounded polynomials implies stability of every corresponding quadratic module. As stability often implies the non-solvability of the Moment Problem, this complements Schmuedgen's result which uses bounded polynomials to check the solvability of the Moment Problem by dimensional induction. We also use stability to generalize a result on the Invariant Moment Problem by Cimpric, Kuhlmann and Scheiderer.


One of the main questions in real algebraic geometry is the following. Let \(A=\mathbb{R}[X_1,\dots,X_n]\) be the polynomial ring in \(n\) variables and let \(f_1,\dots, f_s\in A\). Consider the basic closed semi-algebraic set \(\mathcal{S}:=\mathcal{S}(f_1,\dots,f_s):=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^n \mid f_1(x)\geq 0,\dots,f_s(x)\geq 0\}\). What can be said about the polynomials that are nonnegative on \(\mathcal{S}\)? Clearly, the elements of the corresponding quadratic module \(QM(f_1,\dots,f_s):=\{\sigma_0+\sigma_1f_1+\dots+\sigma_s f_s\mid \sigma_i\in\sum A^2\}\), finitely generated by \(f_1,\dots,f_s\) (where \(\sum A^2\) denotes the sum of squares in \(A\)), are nonnegative on \(\mathcal{S}\). The interesting question is whether the converse holds. One of the key notions in this context is stability of a quadratic module, introduced by \textit{V. Powers} and \textit{C. Scheiderer} [Adv. Geom. 1, 71--88 (2001; Zbl 0984.44012)]. It can be formulated in the following way. The quadratic module \(M:=QM(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) is called stable, if for every finite dimensional subspace \(U\) of \(A\) there is another finite dimensional subspace \(W\) of \(A\) such that for every \(f\in M\cap U\) there are \(\sigma_i\in\sum W^2\) such that \(f=\sigma_0+\sigma_1f_1+\dots+\sigma_sf_s\). One of the main consequences of stability is that if \(\dim(S)\geq 2\) then \(M\) does not have the so-called Strong Moment property, i.e. there is a linear functional on \(A\) that is nonnegative on \(M\) and does not come from a measure on \(\mathcal{S}\). In particular, \(M\) does not contain all polynomials that are nonnegative on \(\mathcal{S}\) [see \textit{C. Scheiderer}, J. Complex. 21, 823--844 (2005; Zbl 1093.13024)]. The author generalizes the notion of stability in the paper under review and obtains new geometric criterions for the stability of finitely generated quadratic modules. The setting is the following. Let \(\{U_\gamma\}_{\gamma\in\Gamma}\) be a filtration of \(A\) where \(\Gamma\) is an ordered Abelian group. The author calls the quadratic module \(M=QM(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) stable with respect to the filtration, if there is a monotonically increasing map \(\rho:M\to M\) such that for every \(\gamma\in\Gamma\) and every \(f\in U_\gamma\) there are \(\sigma_i\in\sum U_{\rho(\gamma)}^2\) such that \(f=\sigma_0+\sigma_1f_1+\dots+\sigma_sf_s\). Note that this definition does not depend on the finitely many generators \(f_1,\dots,f_s\) of \(M\). Stability of \(M\) with respect to a grading \(A=\bigoplus_{\gamma\in\Gamma}A_\gamma\) of \(A\) is then defined as the stability with respect to the filtration induced by the grading. For example, in the case of the usual degree grading of \(A\) one gets the classical stability. The author introduces another notion. He calls the quadratic module \(M=QM(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) totally stable with respect to a grading of \(A\) if \(\text{deg}(f)\leq \text{deg}(f+g)\) for all \(f,g\in M\) (where \(\text{deg}\) denotes the degree with respect to the grading). Note that total stability implies stability with respect to the grading. The author shows the following. Let \(A=\bigoplus_{\gamma\in\Gamma}A_\gamma\) be a grading and let \(M=QM(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) be a finitely generated quadratic module. If \(\mathcal{S}(f_1^{\max},\dots,f_s^{\max} )\subset\mathbb{R}^n\) is Zariski dense, then \(M\) is totally stable with respect to the grading. Here \(f^{\max}\) denotes the highest degree part of \(f\). He uses this to give a geometric criterion for totally stability via so-called tentacles. Applying these results and covering the usual degree grading by finitely many gradings in a suitable way he obtains new geometric criterions for \(\mathcal{S}=\mathcal{S}(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) such that \(M=QM(f_1,\dots,f_s)\) is stable. With this in hand he gets nice examples in the plane. The paper is written in a very clear way.











This page was built for publication: Stability of quadratic modules

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q834811)