Evaluating bias correction in weighted proportional hazards regression

DOI10.1007/s10985-008-9102-4zbMath1282.62157OpenAlexW2087371059WikidataQ36009187 ScholiaQ36009187MaRDI QIDQ841053

Douglas E. Schaubel, Qing Pan

Publication date: 14 September 2009

Published in: Lifetime Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3367517

zbMATH Keywords

Wald testproportional hazards modelobservational studiesselection biasconfidence bandsBreslow-Aalen estimatorinverse-selection-probability weights

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions (62G15) General nonlinear regression (62J02) Reliability and life testing (62N05)

Related Items

Outcomes matter: estimating pre-transplant survival rates of kidney-transplant patients using simulator-based propensity scores

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
• Towards a general asymptotic theory for Cox model with staggered entry
• Weak convergence and empirical processes. With applications to statistics
• The Role of Sampling Weights When Modeling Survey Data
• Proportional hazards models based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities
• Partial likelihood
• Inference and missing data
• Confidence Bands for Survival Curves Under the Proportional Hazards Model
• On fitting Cox's proportional hazards models to survey data
• A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe