A shorter proof that palindromes are not a Church-Rosser language, with extensions to almost-confluent and preperfect Thue systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:844899
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3756462 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2086618 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 789389 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1408346 (Why is no real title available?)
- Church-Rosser Thue systems and formal languages
- Computational Complexity of One-Tape Turing Machine Computations
- Confluent and Other Types of Thue Systems
- Growing context-sensitive languages and Church-Rosser languages
- Lower bound technique for length-reducing automata
- Preperfectness is undecidable for Thue systems containing only length- reducing rules and a single commutation rule
- The Church-Rosser languages are the deterministic variants of the growing context-sensitive languages
- The undecidability of the preperfectness of Thue systems
- Une généralisation des ensembles de Dyck
This page was built for publication: A shorter proof that palindromes are not a Church-Rosser language, with extensions to almost-confluent and preperfect Thue systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q844899)