Propositional relevance through letter-sharing

DOI10.1016/J.JAL.2008.12.001MaRDI QIDQ846520zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors David Makinson

Publication date 9 February 2010

Published in Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30255/1/Makinson_Propositional-relevance-through-letter-sharing_2009.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

belief changebelief setlanguage-dependencepropositional relevancesyntactic dependence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• Splitting and relevance: broadening the scope of Parikh's concepts
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4057477
• Relevance from an epistemic perspective
• A formal analysis of relevance
• Prime implicates and relevant belief revision

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5316610 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1946872 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1537944 (Why is no real title available?)
• Advances in Artificial Intelligence – SBIA 2004
• Entailment and relevance¹
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Parallel interpolation, splitting, and relevance in belief change
• Resource bounded belief revision

Cited in

(15)

• Independence -- revision and defaults
• A formal analysis of relevance
• AGM 25 years. Twenty-five years of research in belief change
• Prime forms and minimal change in propositional belief bases
• The dynamics of relevance: adaptive belief revision
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7471689 (Why is no real title available?)
• Deductive belief change
• Lost in translation: language independence in propositional logic -- application to belief change
• On AGM for non-classical logics
• Approaching truth in conceptual spaces
• Splitting and relevance: broadening the scope of Parikh's concepts
• Mighty belief revision
• Relevance in belief update
• Generalizing Parikh’s Criterion for Relevance-Sensitive Belief Revision
• How to deal with unbelievable assertions

This page was built for publication: Propositional relevance through letter-sharing

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q846520)