Comparison of relative cohomology theories with respect to semidualizing modules

From MaRDI portal
Publication:848828

DOI10.1007/S00209-009-0480-4zbMATH Open1190.13007arXiv0706.3635OpenAlexW2132180373MaRDI QIDQ848828FDOQ848828

Tirdad Sharif, Diana White, Sean Sather-Wagstaff

Publication date: 23 February 2010

Published in: Mathematische Zeitschrift (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We compare and contrast various relative cohomology theories that arise from resolutions involving semidualizing modules. We prove a general balance result for relative cohomology over a Cohen-Macaulay ring with a dualizing module, and we demonstrate the failure of the naive version of balance one might expect for these functors. We prove that the natural comparison morphisms between relative cohomology modules are isomorphisms in several cases, and we provide a Yoneda-type description of the first relative Ext functor. Finally, we show by example that each distinct relative cohomology construction does in fact result in a different functor.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3635




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (39)





This page was built for publication: Comparison of relative cohomology theories with respect to semidualizing modules

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q848828)