Relaxation time of L-reversal chains and other chromosome shuffles

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:862215)
Relaxation time of \(L\)-reversal chains and other chromosome shuffles



Abstract: We prove tight bounds on the relaxation time of the so-called L-reversal chain, which was introduced by R. Durrett as a stochastic model for the evolution of chromosome chains. The process is described as follows. We have n distinct letters on the vertices of the n-cycle (mathbbZ mod n); at each step, a connected subset of the graph is chosen uniformly at random among all those of length at most L, and the current permutation is shuffled by reversing the order of the letters over that subset. We show that the relaxation time au(n,L), defined as the inverse of the spectral gap of the associated Markov generator, satisfies au(n,L)=O(nveefracn3L3). Our results can be interpreted as strong evidence for a conjecture of R. Durrett predicting a similar behavior for the mixing time of the chain.


R. Durrett has used an \(L\)-reversed continuous time Markov chain to model the evolution of chromosome chains. The state space consists of the \(n!\) configurations of an \(n\)-cycle with vertices numbered \(1\) to \(n\geq 2\) and the chain is obtained by doing \(L\)-reversals at the arrival times of a Poisson process with rate \(1\). A \(L\)-reversal consists in choosing a vertex at random (with uniform distribution) and independently choosing a length \(l\) (\(1\leq l\leq L\leq n\)) at random (with uniform distribution) and reversing the order of the vertices in the segment starting at \(x\) and ending at \(x+l\) (sum taken modulo \(n\)). Durrett has conjectured that the missing time \(T(n,L)=\inf \{t>0:\| p_{t}-\nu \| _{TV}\leq 1/e\}\) (where \(p_{t}\) and \(\nu \) are, respectively, the distribution at time \(t\) and the uniform distribution on the state space and \(TV\) stands for the total variation norm) satisfies \(\frac{1}{C}( \max (n,n^{3}/L^{3})) \log n\leq T(n,L)\leq C( \max (n,n^{3}/L^{3})) \log n\) for some constant \(C\). The upper bound was not proved and this paper could not prove or disprove it. Instead, it shows that \(\frac{1}{C}\max (n,n^{3}/L^{3})\leq \tau (n,L)\leq C( \max (n,n^{3}/L^{3})) \) for the relaxation time \(\tau (n,L)=\sup_{f} \text{Var}(f)/\mathcal{E}(f,f)\), where the supremum is taken over all non-constant functions \(f\) of the configuration \(\eta \), \(\text{Var}(f)=\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\eta }f^{2}(\eta )-( \frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\eta }f(\eta )) ^{2}\) and \[ \mathcal{E}(f,f)=\frac{1}{2nL}\sum_{x=1}^{n}\sum_{l=1}^{L}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\eta }( (f(\eta ^{xl})-f(\eta )^{2}) \] with \(\eta ^{xl}\) the configuration resulting from \(\eta \) by doing the reversal described above. The authors also consider the case where the segment length is chosen according to a non-uniform distribution \(p(l)\propto \theta ^{l}\) and obtain \[ \frac{1}{C}\max (n,[ n(1-\theta )] ^{3})\leq \tau (n,\theta )\leq C( \max (n,[ n(1-\theta )] ^{3})) \] for \(\tau (n,\theta )=\sup_{f}\text{Var}(f)/\mathcal{E}_{\theta }(f,f)\) with \[ \mathcal{E}_{\theta }(f,f)=\frac{1-\theta }{2n}\sum_{x=1}^{n}\sum_{l=1}^{L}\theta ^{l-1}\frac{1}{n!}\sum_{\eta }( (f(\eta ^{xl})-f(\eta )^{2}). \]











This page was built for publication: Relaxation time of \(L\)-reversal chains and other chromosome shuffles

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q862215)