Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the v-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics, by A. Chubykalo et al.

From MaRDI portal
Publication:867010

DOI10.1007/S10702-006-1011-8zbMATH Open1118.78003arXivphysics/0702218OpenAlexW1998208559MaRDI QIDQ867010FDOQ867010


Authors: José A. Heras Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 February 2007

Published in: Foundations of Physics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Fundamental errors in the Chubykalo et al paper [Found. of Phys. Lett, 19, 37-46 (2006)] are highlighted. Contrary to their claim that "... the irrotational component of the electric field has a physical meaning and can propagate exclusively instantaneously," it is shown that this instantaneous component is physically irrelevant because it is always canceled by a term contained into the solenoidal component. This result follows directly from the solution of the wave equation that satisfies the solenoidal component. Therefore the subsequent inference of these authors that there are two mechanisms of transmission of energy and momentum in classical electrodynamics, one retarded and the other one instantaneous, has no basis. The example given by these authors in which the full electric field of an oscillating charge equals its instantaneous irrotational component on the axis of oscillations is proved to be false.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0702218




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the \(v\)-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics, by A. Chubykalo et al.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q867010)