On correspondences between toric singularities and (p,q)-webs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:874463

DOI10.1016/J.NUCLPHYSB.2004.08.048zbMATH Open1124.81305arXivhep-th/0403133OpenAlexW2066082776MaRDI QIDQ874463FDOQ874463

Francis Lam, Bo Feng, Yang-Hui He

Publication date: 10 April 2007

Published in: Nuclear Physics B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study four-dimensional N=1 gauge theories which arise from D3-brane probes of toric Calabi-Yau threefolds. There are some standing paradoxes in the literature regarding relations among (p,q)-webs, toric diagrams and various phases of the gauge theories, we resolve them by proposing and carefully distinguishing between two kinds of (p,q)-webs: toric and quiver (p,q)-webs. The former has a one to one correspondence with the toric diagram while the latter can correspond to multiple gauge theories. The key reason for this ambiguity is that a given quiver (p,q)-web can not capture non-chiral matter fields in the gauge theory. To support our claim we analyse families of theories emerging from partial resolution of Abelian orbifolds using the Inverse Algorithm of hep-th/0003085 as well as (p,q)-web techniques. We present complex inter-relations among these theories by Higgsing, blowups and brane splittings. We also point out subtleties involved in the ordering of legs in the (p,q) diagram.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403133





Cites Work


Cited In (18)


   Recommendations





This page was built for publication: On correspondences between toric singularities and \((p,q)\)-webs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q874463)