IR free or interacting? A proposed diagnostic

From MaRDI portal
Publication:876289

DOI10.1016/J.NUCLPHYSB.2005.10.005zbMATH Open1276.81108arXivhep-th/0509085OpenAlexW2054489707MaRDI QIDQ876289FDOQ876289


Authors: Kenneth Intriligator Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 April 2007

Published in: Nuclear Physics B (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We present and discuss a conjectured criterion for determining whether a 4d quantum field theory is IR free, or flows to an interacting conformal field theory in the infrared: ``the correct infrared phase is that with the larger conformal anomaly a". A stronger conjecture is that ``an operator can become IR free only if that results in a larger conformal anomaly a". We test these conjectures in the context of N=1 supersymmetric theories. They are verified to indeed predict the correct IR phase in every tested case, for a plethora of examples for which the infrared phase could already be determined on other grounds. When applied to the still unsettled case of SU(2) with a chiral superfield in the isospin 3/2 representation, the conjecture suggest that the IR phase is conformal rather than confining.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0509085




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (16)





This page was built for publication: IR free or interacting? A proposed diagnostic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q876289)