Why TCP timers (still) don't work well

DOI10.1016/J.COMNET.2006.10.006zbMATH Open1111.68334OpenAlexW2135906636MaRDI QIDQ878720FDOQ878720

Authors Ioannis Psaras, Vassilis Tsaoussidis

Publication date 26 April 2007

Published in Computer Networks (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.10.006

zbMATH Keywords

packet schedulingcongestion controlTCPflow contentionretransmission timeout

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Performance evaluation, queueing, and scheduling in the context of computer systems (68M20) Network design and communication in computer systems (68M10)

Recommendations

• On randomizing the sending times in TCP and other window based algorithms
• TCP westwood: End-to-end congestion control for wired/wireless networks
• A competitive analysis for retransmission timeout
• Achieving high throughput and TCP Reno fairness in delay-based TCP over large networks
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2088395

Cited in

(2)

• On randomizing the sending times in TCP and other window based algorithms
• An algorithm to detect TCP spurious timeouts and its application to operational UMTS/GPRS networks

This page was built for publication: Why TCP timers (still) don't work well

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q878720)