Comment on: ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
DOI10.1007/S11004-014-9544-ZzbMATH Open1323.86034OpenAlexW2008916753MaRDI QIDQ887597FDOQ887597
Authors: H. Schaeben 
Publication date: 26 October 2015
Published in: Mathematical Geosciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9544-z
Recommendations
- A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
- Comparison of mathematical methods of potential modeling
- A mathematical view of weights-of-evidence, conditional independence, and logistic regression in terms of Markov random fields
- Potential modeling: conditional independence matters
- BoostWofE: a new sequential weights of evidence model reducing the effect of conditional dependency
missing dataconditional independencetargetingmathematical modeling assumptionsparsimonious mathematical modelpotential modelingproper predictionssimple mathematical model
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A mathematical view of weights-of-evidence, conditional independence, and logistic regression in terms of Markov random fields
- A note on the domination inequalities and their applications
- Potential modeling: conditional independence matters
- A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
Cited In (3)
This page was built for publication: Comment on: ``A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q887597)
