Four methods for determining intermediate perturbed orbits from three observations: A comparison
DOI10.1007/S11182-015-0421-0zbMATH Open1326.70044OpenAlexW2037534690MaRDI QIDQ895035FDOQ895035
Authors: V. A. Shefer
Publication date: 26 November 2015
Published in: Russian Physics Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11182-015-0421-0
Recommendations
Gauss methoddetermination of the initial orbitHerrick-Gibbs methodintermediate perturbed orbitsuperosculating orbit
Stability and convergence of numerical methods for ordinary differential equations (65L20) Two-body problems (70F05) Numerical investigation of stability of solutions to ordinary differential equations (65L07) General perturbation schemes for nonlinear problems in mechanics (70K60) Orbital mechanics (70M20)
Cites Work
Cited In (8)
- Generalization of a method by Mossotti for initial orbit determination
- Mathematical modeling of motion of the asteroid 99942 Apophis on the basis of Adams methods with a variable step size
- Interpolation methods used to obtain orbit coordinates and elements of the solar system large planets and small bodies
- Dependence on the observational time intervals and domain of convergence of orbital determination methods
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Four classical methods for determining planetary elliptic elements: a comparison
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Intrinsic nonlinearity and method of disturbed observations in inverse problems of celestial mechanics
This page was built for publication: Four methods for determining intermediate perturbed orbits from three observations: A comparison
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q895035)