On the balanced decomposition number

From MaRDI portal
Publication:897290

DOI10.1007/S00373-015-1526-5zbMATH Open1327.05280arXiv1212.2308OpenAlexW1964083083MaRDI QIDQ897290FDOQ897290


Authors: Tadashi Sakuma Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 December 2015

Published in: Graphs and Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A {em balanced coloring} of a graph G means a triple P1,P2,X of mutually disjoint subsets of the vertex-set V(G) such that V(G)=P1uplusP2uplusX and |P1|=|P2|. A {em balanced decomposition} associated with the balanced coloring V(G)=P1uplusP2uplusX of G is defined as a partition of V(G)=V1upluscdotsuplusVr (for some r) such that, for every iin1,cdots,r, the subgraph G[Vi] of G is connected and |VicapP1|=|VicapP2|. Then the {em balanced decomposition number} of a graph G is defined as the minimum integer s such that, for every balanced coloring V(G)=P1uplusP2uplusX of G, there exists a balanced decomposition V(G)=V1upluscdotsuplusVr whose every element Vi(i=1,cdots,r) has at most s vertices. S. Fujita and H. Liu [/SIAM J. Discrete Math. 24, (2010), pp. 1597--1616/] proved a nice theorem which states that the balanced decomposition number of a graph G is at most 3 if and only if G is lfloorfrac|V(G)|2floor-connected. Unfortunately, their proof is lengthy (about 10 pages) and complicated. Here we give an immediate proof of the theorem. This proof makes clear a relationship between balanced decomposition number and graph matching.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.2308




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: On the balanced decomposition number

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q897290)