Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:899191
DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2015.07.001zbMATH Open1344.68224OpenAlexW835693417MaRDI QIDQ899191FDOQ899191
Publication date: 21 December 2015
Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.07.001
Recommendations
- Two roles of preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Preference-based argumentation built from prioritized logic programming
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Assumption-based argumentation equipped with preferences and its application to decision making, practical reasoning, and epistemic reasoning
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
- Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics
- Preferred extensions as stable models
- Qualitative choice logic
- Two alternatives for handling preferences in qualitative choice logic
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
- Arguing with Valued Preference Relations
- Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions
- Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
- Metalevel argumentation
- Hierarchical Argumentation
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
- A Revised Qualitative Choice Logic for Handling Prioritized Preferences
- Argumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problems
- An alert correlation approach based on security operator's knowledge and preferences
- On the Use of Argumentation for Multiple Criteria Decision Making
- Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument
- A system for defeasible argumentation, with defeasible priorities
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q899191)
