Karl Pearson's theoretical errors and the advances they inspired
From MaRDI portal
Publication:900464
DOI10.1214/08-STS256zbMATH Open1327.62013arXiv0808.4032MaRDI QIDQ900464FDOQ900464
Authors: Stephen M. Stigler
Publication date: 22 December 2015
Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Karl Pearson played an enormous role in determining the content and organization of statistical research in his day, through his research, his teaching, his establishment of laboratories, and his initiation of a vast publishing program. His technical contributions had initially and continue today to have a profound impact upon the work of both applied and theoretical statisticians, partly through their inadequately acknowledged influence upon Ronald A. Fisher. Particular attention is drawn to two of Pearson's major errors that nonetheless have left a positive and lasting impression upon the statistical world.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.4032
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1166035
- A history of the theory of errors
- Early antecedents of error theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5009662
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2108956
- Karl Pearson a century and a half after his birth
- R. A. Fisher on Karl Pearson
- Helmert's work in the theory of errors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2182939
Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of statistics (62-03)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- R. A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912--1922
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The epic story of maximum likelihood
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Fisher in 1921
- Karl Pearson and the Chi-Squared Test
- R. A. Fisher: an appreciation
- Karl pearson's mathematization of inheritance: From ancestral heredity to Mendelian genetics (1895–1909)
- Karl Pearson--An Appreciation on the 100th Anniversary of his Birth
- R. A. Fisher on Karl Pearson
- ON THE PROBABILITY THAT TWO INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTIONS OF FREQUENCY ARE REALLY SAMPLES FROM THE SAME PARENT POPULATION
- The Pedigree of the International Biometric Society*
- Louis Napoleon George Filon
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (20)
- The epic story of maximum likelihood
- The “Poisson” Distribution: History, Reenactments, Adaptations
- Impact of Karl Pearson's work on statistical developments in India
- Karl Pearson -- the scientific life in a statistical age by Theodore M. Porter: a review
- Karl Pearson in Russian contexts
- Relations between biology and statistics: Karl Pearson and the principle of homotyposis (1901--1902)
- R. A. Fisher on Karl Pearson
- A decomposition of Pearson-Fisher and Dzhaparidze-Nikulin statistics and some ideas for a more powerful test construction
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Mistakes concerning a chance encounter between Francis Galton and John Venn
- Splitting models for multivariate count data
- W. F. Sheppard's correspondence with Karl Pearson and the development of his tables and moment estimates
- Studies in the history of probability and statistics, L: Karl Pearson and the rule of three
- The two-piece normal, binormal, or double Gaussian distribution: its origin and rediscoveries
- Karl Pearson a century and a half after his birth
- A conversation with Stephen M. Stigler
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIII Karl Pearson and quasi-independence
- The chi-square controversy: what if Pearson had R?
- How Ronald Fisher became a mathematical statistician
This page was built for publication: Karl Pearson's theoretical errors and the advances they inspired
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q900464)