Dynamic adaptive multiple tests with finite sample FDR control
From MaRDI portal
Publication:900753
DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2015.06.007zbMath1328.62267arXiv1410.6296MaRDI QIDQ900753
Arnold Janssen, Philipp Heesen
Publication date: 22 December 2015
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.6296
multiple hypothesis testing; false discovery rate (FDR); dynamic adaptive step up tests; improved Benjamini Hochberg test
62G10: Nonparametric hypothesis testing
Related Items
Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg, New FDR bounds for discrete and heterogeneous tests, The false discovery rate (FDR) of multiple tests in a class room lecture, Inequalities for the false discovery rate (FDR) under dependence
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses
- FDR control with adaptive procedures and FDR monotonicity
- On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate
- On methods controlling the false discovery rate
- A cross-validation based estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses
- Rejoinder on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling
- Parametric statistical theory: with the assistance of R. Hamböker
- The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the \(q\)-value
- The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.
- Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures.
- On false discovery control under dependence
- Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- A note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence
- Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment
- Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses
- Adaptive and Dynamic Adaptive Procedures for False Discovery Rate Control and Estimation
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Testing Statistical Hypotheses
- Statistical significance for genomewide studies
- Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses, with application to DNA Microarray Data
- The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments
