On the importance of interpretation in quantum physics: a reply to Elise Crull
From MaRDI portal
Publication:905003
Abstract: Crull (2014) claims that by invoking decoherence it is possible (i) to obviate many ``fine grained issues often conflated under the common designation of measurement problem, and (ii) to make substantial progresses in the fields of quantum gravity and quantum cosmology, without any early incorporation of a particular interpretation in the quantum formalism. We point out that Crull is mistaken about decoherence and tacitly assumes some kind of interpretation of the quantum formalism.
Recommendations
- Interpretation and decoherence: a contribution to the debate Vassallo \& Esfeld versus Crull
- Less interpretation and more decoherence in quantum gravity and inflationary cosmology
- Less decoherence and more coherence in quantum gravity, inflationary cosmology and elsewhere
- Yes, more decoherence: a reply to critics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1639647
Cites work
Cited in
(5)- Interpretation and decoherence: a contribution to the debate Vassallo \& Esfeld versus Crull
- Yes, more decoherence: a reply to critics
- The measurement problem: decoherence and convivial solipsism
- Less interpretation and more decoherence in quantum gravity and inflationary cosmology
- GianCarlo Ghirardi and the interpretation of quantum physics
This page was built for publication: On the importance of interpretation in quantum physics: a reply to Elise Crull
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q905003)