Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal

From MaRDI portal
Publication:905560

DOI10.1088/1126-6708/2008/12/080zbMATH Open1329.83112arXiv0809.1480OpenAlexW2030898565MaRDI QIDQ905560FDOQ905560


Authors: Sungwook E. Hong, Dong-Il Hwang, Heeseung Zoe, Dong-Han Yeom Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 20 January 2016

Published in: Journal of High Energy Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: To implement the consistent black hole complementarity principle, we need two assumptions: first, there exists a singularity near the center, and second, global horizons are the same as local horizons. However, these assumptions are not true in general. In this paper, the authors study a charged black hole in which the second assumption may not hold. From the previous simulations, we have argued that the event horizon is quite close to the outer horizon, and it seems not harmful to black hole complementarity; however, the Cauchy horizon can be different from the inner horizon, and a violation of complementarity will be possible. To maintain complementarity, we need to assume a selection principle between the singularity and the Hawking radiation generating surface; we suggest that Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal can be useful for this purpose. Finally, we discussed some conditions under which the selection principle may not work.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.1480




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena's proposal

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q905560)