Assessing the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics

From MaRDI portal
Publication:905645

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2014.04.001zbMATH Open1329.81038arXiv1406.4351OpenAlexW2002199100MaRDI QIDQ905645FDOQ905645


Authors: Jeremy Butterfield Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 January 2016

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This paper gives a philosophical assessment of the Montevideo interpretation of quantum theory, advocated by Gambini, Pullin and co-authors. This interpretation has the merit of linking its proposal about how to solve the measurement problem to the search for quantum gravity: namely by suggesting that quantum gravity makes for fundamental limitations on the accuracy of clocks, which imply a type of decoherence that "collapses the wave-packet". I begin (Section 2) by sketching the topics of decoherence, and quantum clocks, on which the interpretation depends. Then I expound the interpretation, from a philosopher's perspective (Sections 3, 4 and 5). Finally, in Section 6, I argue that the interpretation, at least as developed so far, is best seen as a form of the Everett interpretation: namely with an effective or approximate branching, that is induced by environmental decoherence of the familiar kind, and by the Montevideans' "temporal decoherence".


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4351




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Assessing the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q905645)