On well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for p-parabolic systems. II

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:908445)





[For part I see ibid. 27, 569-586 (1987; Zbl 0636.35033).] Let A(x,D) be a matrix pseudo-differential operator of order p in the form \[ (1)\quad A(x,D)=H(x,D)\Lambda^ p+B(x,D),\quad x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\ell}, \] where H(x,\(\xi)\) is \(m\times m\) homogeneous matrix of degree 0 in \(\xi\) (\(| \xi | \geq 1)\) and smooth in x and \(\xi\). B(x,\(\xi)\) belongs to the class \(S^{P_ 0}_{1,0}\), \(0\leq p_ 0\leq p\), modulo smoothing operators and \(\Lambda\) is a pseudodifferential operator, where the symbol belongs to \(S^ 1_{1,0}\) and coincides with \(| \xi |\) for \(| \xi | \geq 1\), p is a positive number. The purpose of this paper is to show that the conditions \[ (2)\quad \sup_{x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\ell}},_{\xi \in S_{\xi}^{\ell - 1}}\lambda;\quad (x,\xi)<0,\quad \ell \leq \forall i\leq m \] is necessary and sufficient in order that there exist positive constants a, b and \(\beta\) such that the estimate \[ (3)\quad \| (\lambda I-A(x,D))U\| \geq a(| \lambda | -\beta_ 0)\| U\| +b\| U\|_ p, \] for \(\forall U\in H^ p\), \(\forall \lambda\), Re \(\lambda\geq \beta_ 0\) holds. Here U(x) is an m-vector, \(\| \cdot \|\), \(\| \cdot \|_ p\) denote \(L^ 2\) and \(H^ p\)-norm respectively, \(\lambda_ i(x,\xi)\) \((i=1,...,m)\) are the roots of the characteristic equation \[ \det (\lambda I-H(x,\xi))=0. \] The sufficiency of condition (2) was proved in Part I. In this part the author shows the necessity of condition (2) for the correctness of inequality (3).











This page was built for publication: On well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for p-parabolic systems. II

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q908445)