Truth table logic, with a survey of embeddability results
The propositional natural deduction systems considered here have standard introduction rules [including (A\(\vdash \Lambda)\vdash \sim A]\) and less standard elimination rules always having conclusion \(\Lambda\), for example, A,\(\sim A/\Lambda\) or A\&B, (A\(\vdash \Lambda)\vdash \Lambda\) etc. Only normal derivations are considered satisfying the relevance condition (discharged assumption cannot be absent), and the normalization theorem is invalid. The main lemma in Kalmar's proof of the completeness theorem, but not the theorem itself, can be proved in the system. A version of Glivenko's theorem (\(\vdash A\) classically implies \(\vdash \sim \sim A\) in the system considered) is also established.
- Strong normalization for truth table natural deduction
- Expressive power and incompleteness of propositional logics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3275554
- Natural deduction and sequent calculus for intuitionistic relevant logic
- Natural deduction systems of some logics with truth-value gluts and truth-value gaps
This page was built for publication: Truth table logic, with a survey of embeddability results
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q912092)