Three optimizations for assume-guarantee reasoning with L^*
From MaRDI portal
Publication:934701
Recommendations
Cites work
- Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems
- Computer Aided Verification
- Computer Aided Verification
- Computer Aided Verification
- Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3926220 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2080060 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1418458 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inference of finite automata using homing sequences
- Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples
- Regular model checking using inference of regular languages
- Synthesis of interface specifications for Java classes
Cited in
(6)- Compositional reasoning
- SAT-Based Compositional Verification Using Lazy Learning
- Computer Aided Verification
- Optimized L*-Based Assume-Guarantee Reasoning
- Learning assumptions for compositional verification of timed automata
- Learning to divide and conquer: applying the \(L^*\) algorithm to automate assume-guarantee reasoning
This page was built for publication: Three optimizations for assume-guarantee reasoning with \(L^{*}\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q934701)