Quasi-nearly subharmonicity and separately quasi-nearly subharmonic functions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:949014

DOI10.1155/2008/149712zbMATH Open1152.31006arXiv0802.3505OpenAlexW3104409550WikidataQ59218136 ScholiaQ59218136MaRDI QIDQ949014FDOQ949014

Juhani Riihentaus

Publication date: 16 October 2008

Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Wiegerinck has shown that a separately subharmonic function need not be subharmonic. Improving previous results of Lelong, of Avanissian, of Arsove and of us, Armitage and Gardiner gave an almost sharp integrability condition which ensures a separately subharmonic function to be subharmonic. Completing now our recent counterparts to the cited results of Lelong, Avanissian and Arsove for so called quasi-nearly subharmonic functions, we present a counterpart to the cited result of Armitage and Gardiner for separately quasi-nearly subharmonic functions. This counterpart enables us to slightly improve Armitage's and Gardiner's original result, too. The method we use is a rather straightforward and technical, but still by no means easy, modification of Armitage's and Gardiner's argument combined with an old argument of Domar.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.3505





Cites Work


Cited In (9)






This page was built for publication: Quasi-nearly subharmonicity and separately quasi-nearly subharmonic functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q949014)