A comparison of risk difference estimators in multi-center studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:951836
DOI10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00175-5zbMATH Open1429.62625MaRDI QIDQ951836FDOQ951836
Authors: Chukiat Viwatwongkasem, Walailuck Böhning
Publication date: 4 November 2008
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- Estimating Risk Difference in Multicenter Studies Under Baseline‐Risk Heterogeneity
- Correcting for heterogeneity and non‐comparability bias in multicenter clinical trials with a rescaled random‐effect excess hazard model
- A simple test of the homogeneity of risk difference in sparse data: an application to a multicenter study
- Comparison of several relative risk estimators with interval-censored data
- Comparison of confidence intervals for adjusted attributable risk estimates under multinomial sampling
- A Revisit on Tests for Homogeneity of the Risk Difference
meta-analysishomogeneityrisk differencerandom effect modelDersimonian-Lairdheterogeneity adjusted estimatorpooling of sparse clinical trials
Cites Work
Cited In (6)
- Correcting for heterogeneity and non‐comparability bias in multicenter clinical trials with a rescaled random‐effect excess hazard model
- The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference
- Using James–Stein Estimators in Homogeneity Tests of the Risk Difference
- Testing the homogeneity of risk differences with sparse count data
- Estimating Risk Difference in Multicenter Studies Under Baseline‐Risk Heterogeneity
- Meta-analysis methods for risk differences
This page was built for publication: A comparison of risk difference estimators in multi-center studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q951836)