A comparison of risk difference estimators in multi-center studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity
From MaRDI portal
Publication:951836
Recommendations
- Estimating Risk Difference in Multicenter Studies Under Baseline‐Risk Heterogeneity
- Correcting for heterogeneity and non‐comparability bias in multicenter clinical trials with a rescaled random‐effect excess hazard model
- A simple test of the homogeneity of risk difference in sparse data: an application to a multicenter study
- Comparison of several relative risk estimators with interval-censored data
- Comparison of confidence intervals for adjusted attributable risk estimates under multinomial sampling
- A Revisit on Tests for Homogeneity of the Risk Difference
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1282224 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Revisit on Tests for Homogeneity of the Risk Difference
- Estimating Risk Difference in Multicenter Studies Under Baseline‐Risk Heterogeneity
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
- Tests for Homogeneity of the Risk Difference when Data are Sparse
Cited in
(6)- Correcting for heterogeneity and non‐comparability bias in multicenter clinical trials with a rescaled random‐effect excess hazard model
- The failure of meta-analytic asymptotics for the seemingly efficient estimator of the common risk difference
- Using James–Stein Estimators in Homogeneity Tests of the Risk Difference
- Testing the homogeneity of risk differences with sparse count data
- Estimating Risk Difference in Multicenter Studies Under Baseline‐Risk Heterogeneity
- Meta-analysis methods for risk differences
This page was built for publication: A comparison of risk difference estimators in multi-center studies under baseline-risk heterogeneity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q951836)
