An empirical likelihood-based method for comparison of treatment effects-test of equality of coefficients in linear models

DOI10.1016/J.CSDA.2009.10.018MaRDI QIDQ962357zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Haiyan Su, Hua Liang

Publication date 6 April 2010

Published in Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.10.018

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics (62-08) Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis (62H15) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05)

Recommendations

• Empirical likelihood ratio tests for the linear regression model with inequality constraints
• Testing treatment effect by combining weighted log-rank tests and using empirical likelihood
• Likelihood ratio tests in linear models with linear inequality restrictions on regression coefficients
• Comparison of approximate tests of fixed effects in linear repeated measures design models with covariates
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5354452
• Empirical likelihood-based estimation of the treatment effect in a pretest-posttest study
• Empirical Likelihood Ratio Tests for Coefficients in High Dimensional Heteroscedastic Linear Models
• Testing the equality of a set of multivariate linear models

Cites work

• An Approximate Test for Comparing Heteroscedastic Regression Models
• Confidence Interval Estimation of Survival Probabilities for Censored Data
• Empirical likelihood
• Empirical likelihood is Bartlett-correctable
• Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional
• Methodology and Algorithms of Empirical Likelihood
• Methods and Applications of Linear Models
• Multiple Comparison of Several Linear Regression Models
• On Bartlett correction of empirical likelihood in the presence of nuisance parameters
• On the Behrens-Fisher problem
• Partially linear models with missing response variables and error-prone covariates
• Some Further Evidence on the Use of the Chow Test under Heteroskedasticity
• Testing Equality of Regressions When Error Variances are Heterogeneous to Study the Production Differentials of Rice in Bangladesh
• Testing Regression Equality with Unequal Variances
• Testing treatment effect by combining weighted log-rank tests and using empirical likelihood
• Tests of Equality Between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions
• Tests of Equality between Sets of Coefficients in Two Linear Regressions when Disturbance Variances are Unequal
• Use of the Chow Test under Heteroscedasticity

Cited in

(3)

• Detecting difference between coefficients in linear model using jackknife empirical likelihood
• Two-sample empirical likelihood method for difference between coefficients in linear regression model
• An empirical likelihood inference for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear model with missing response data

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• PS

This page was built for publication: An empirical likelihood-based method for comparison of treatment effects-test of equality of coefficients in linear models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q962357)