Credible sets for risk ratios in over-reported two-sample binomial data using the double-sampling scheme
From MaRDI portal
Publication:962383
DOI10.1016/J.CSDA.2009.11.011zbMATH Open1464.62145OpenAlexW2069106271MaRDI QIDQ962383FDOQ962383
Authors: Dewi Rahardja, Dean M. Young 
Publication date: 6 April 2010
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.11.011
Recommendations
- Bayesian credible sets for the risk difference in binomial data with a fallible classifier and a gold standard
- Likelihood-based confidence intervals for the risk ratio using double sampling with over-reported binary data
- A Bayesian approach to obtain confidence intervals for binomial proportion in a double sampling scheme subject to false-positive misclassification
- Bayesian confidence intervals of proportion with misclassified binary data
- Bayesian analysis of complementary Poisson rate parameters with data subject to misclassifica\-tion
Cites Work
- Misclassification in 2 X 2 Tables
- A Double Sampling Scheme for Estimating from Misclassified Multinomial Data with Applications to Sampling Inspection
- Confidence intervals for a binomial parameter based on binary data subject to false-positive misclassification
- Case-control analysis with partial knowledge of exposure misclassification probabilities
- Implications of Errors in Survey Data: A Bayesian Model
- On the Use of Double Sampling Schemes in Analyzing Categorical Data with Misclassification Errors
- Bayesian analysis of prevalence from the results of small screening samples
- Repeated audit controls
- Birth Defects Registered by Double Sampling: A Bayesian Approach Incorporating Covariates and Model Uncertainty
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Credible sets for risk ratios in over-reported two-sample binomial data using the double-sampling scheme
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q962383)
