Multipliers, phases and connectivity of MRA wavelets in L^2( R^2)

DOI10.1007/S00041-009-9089-6MaRDI QIDQ967575zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Xingde Dai, Y. Diao, Jianguo Xin, Zhongyan Li

Publication date 30 April 2010

Published in The Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-009-9089-6

A-dilation MRA wavelet connectivity of wavelets phase of wavelet wavelet multiplier

General harmonic expansions, frames (42C15) Nontrigonometric harmonic analysis involving wavelets and other special systems (42C40)

Review text

Given a matrix \(A\in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}\), a function \(\psi\in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)\) is an \(A\)-dilation wavelet if the set \[ \{|\det(A)|^{\frac{n}{2}}\psi(A^nt-\ell): n\in\mathbb{Z}, \ell\in\mathbb{Z}^d\} \] is an orthonormal basis for \(L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)\). A measurable function \(f\) is an \(A\)-dilation wavelet multiplier if the inverse Fourier transform of \((f\widehat{\psi})\) is an \(A\)-dilation wavelet for any \(A\)-dilation wavelet \(\psi\). Here \(\widehat{\psi}\) denotes the Fourier transform of \(\psi\). A problem in wavelet theory concerns the characterization of the \(A\)-dilation wavelet multiplier. Another one is whether the collection of all or some class of orthonormal wavelets is path-connected under the \(L^2\)-norm. In the one-dimensional case, \(A\)-wavelets multipliers have been characterized completely, when \(A=2\). Besides, although it is proved that the set of all \(A\)-dilation multi-resolution analysis wavelets (or \(A\)-dilation MRA wavelet for short) is path-connected under \(L^2(\mathbb{R})\)-norm, the path-connectedness for the set of all orthonormal wavelets still remains an open question. In this paper, the authors consider the above two problems in the two-dimensional case for expansive \(2\times 2\) matrices \(A\) with integer entries and \(|\det(A)|=2\). For this, they use the following equivalence relation in the set of these particular matrices: \(A\sim B\Longleftrightarrow\) there exists an integral matrix \(P\) with \(|\det(P)|=1\) such that \(A=P^{-1}BP\). It turns out that this relation produces exactly six equivalence classes [see \textit{J. C. Lagarias} and \textit{T. Wan}, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 2, No. 1, 1--14 (1995; Zbl 0908.42022)]. The authors list explicitly six representatives for this equivalence relation, \(\{A_1, \ldots, A_6\}\). Then, if \(A\sim B\) under \(P\), they prove: (1) \(\psi(\cdot)\) is a \(B\)-dilation wavelet if and only if \(\psi(P\cdot)\) is an \(A\)-dilation wavelet and (2) \(f(\cdot)\) is an \(B\)-dilation wavelet multiplier if and only if \(f((P^t)^{-1}\cdot)\) is an \(A\)-dilation wavelet multiplier. This result allows them to reduce the problem of characterizing the \(A\)-dilation wavelet multiplier for each of the equivalence classes. They also show that for any two \(A\)-dilation MRA wavelets \(\psi_0\) and \(\psi_1\), there exists a continuous map \(\gamma:[0,1]\rightarrow L^2(\mathbb R^2)\) such that \(\gamma(0)=\psi_0\), \(\gamma(1)=\psi_1\) and \(\gamma(t)\) is an \(A\)-dilation MRA wavelet \(\forall\,t\in[0,1]\). The authors prove this result directly constructing a continuous path connecting the two \(A\)-dilation MRA wavelets, where \(A\) is one of the matrices \(A_1,\dots, A_6\). Therefore, the general case follows using (1) and (2).

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(27)

This page was built for publication: Multipliers, phases and connectivity of MRA wavelets in \(L^{2}(\mathbb R^{2})\)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q967575)