Bridge number and Conway products
From MaRDI portal
Publication:969665
DOI10.2140/AGT.2010.10.789zbMATH Open1200.57003arXiv0712.1625OpenAlexW2137017004MaRDI QIDQ969665FDOQ969665
Authors: Ryan Blair
Publication date: 7 May 2010
Published in: Algebraic \& Geometric Topology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Schubert proved that, given a composite link with summands and , the bridge number of satisfies the following equation: �eta(K)=�eta(K_{1})+�eta(K_{2})-1. In ``Conway Produts and Links with Multiple Bridge Surfaces", Scharlemann and Tomova proved that, given links and , there is a Conway product such that �eta(K_{1} imes_{c} K_{2}) leq �eta(K_{1}) + �eta(K_{2}) - 1 In this paper, we define the generalized Conway product and prove the lower bound where is the distinguished factor of the generalized product. We go on to show this lower bound is tight for an infinite class of links with arbitrarily high bridge number.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1625
Recommendations
thin positionbridge positionc-incompressible surfaceConway sphere of a knotdistinguished factorgeneralized Conway product
Cites Work
Cited In (8)
- Width is not additive
- The incompatibility of crossing number and bridge number for knot diagrams
- Conway products and links with multiple bridge surfaces
- Knots with compressible thin levels
- Additivity of bridge numbers of knots
- Bridge number and tangle products
- An explanatory bijection of some properties of bridges
- Height, trunk and representativity of knots
This page was built for publication: Bridge number and Conway products
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q969665)