Biased tug-of-war, the biased infinity Laplacian, and comparison with exponential cones

From MaRDI portal
Publication:982182




Abstract: We prove that if UsubsetR^n is an open domain whose closure overline{U} is compact in the path metric, and F is a Lipschitz function on partial{U}, then for each �etainR there exists a unique viscosity solution to the �eta-biased infinity Laplacian equation �eta |

abla u| + Delta_infty u=0 on U that extends F, where Delta_infty u= |

abla u|^{-2} sum_{i,j} u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j} u_{x_j}. In the proof, we extend the tug-of-war ideas of Peres, Schramm, Sheffield and Wilson, and define the �eta-biased eps-game as follows. The starting position is x_0 in U. At the k^ ext{th} step the two players toss a suitably biased coin (in our key example, player I wins with odds of exp(�etaeps) to 1), and the winner chooses x_k with d(x_k,x_{k-1}) < eps. The game ends when x_k in partial{U}, and player II pays the amount F(x_k) to player I. We prove that the value u^{eps}(x_0) of this game exists, and that |u^eps - u|_infty o 0 as eps o 0, where u is the unique extension of F to overline{U} that satisfies comparison with �eta-exponential cones. Comparison with exponential cones is a notion that we introduce here, and generalizing a theorem of Crandall, Evans and Gariepy regarding comparison with linear cones, we show that a continuous function satisfies comparison with �eta-exponential cones if and only if it is a viscosity solution to the �eta-biased infinity Laplacian equation.




Cited in
(28)






This page was built for publication: Biased tug-of-war, the biased infinity Laplacian, and comparison with exponential cones

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q982182)