Why do mathematicians need different ways of presenting mathematical objects? The case of Cayley graphs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:989745
DOI10.1007/S11245-009-9065-4zbMATH Open1195.00053OpenAlexW1988785502MaRDI QIDQ989745FDOQ989745
Publication date: 23 August 2010
Published in: Topoi (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-009-9065-4
Cites Work
- Square-free non-Cayley numbers. On vertex-transitive non-Cayley graphs of square-free order.
- Mathematical intuition vs. mathematical monsters
- Tangent unit-vector fields: non-abelian homotopy invariants and the Dirichlet energy
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (5)
Recommendations
- Mathematical tools for the future: graph theory and graphicable algebras π π
- Some problems on Cayley graphs π π
- Logical aspects of Cayley-graphs: the group case π π
- Cayley Graphs Versus Algebraic Graphs π π
- Cayley graphs and \(G\)-graphs: some applications π π
- Cayley graphs and group presentations π π
- Characterising planar Cayley graphs and Cayley complexes in terms of group presentations π π
- Approximating Cayley diagrams versus Cayley graphs π π
This page was built for publication: Why do mathematicians need different ways of presenting mathematical objects? The case of Cayley graphs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q989745)