A simple proof of the necessity of the failure detector to implement an atomic register in asynchronous message-passing systems
From MaRDI portal
Publication:990136
Recommendations
- The weakest failure detector to implement a register in asynchronous systems with hybrid communication
- Non-blocking atomic commit in asynchronous distributed systems with failure detectors
- Mutual exclusion in asynchronous systems with failure detectors
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2013834
- Tight failure detection bounds on atomic object implementations
- The weakest failure detectors to solve quittable consensus and nonblocking atomic commit
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 996442 (Why is no real title available?)
- Asynchronous bounded lifetime failure detectors
- Distributed Computing
- Efficient and Robust Sharing of Memory in Message-Passing Systems
- Sharing memory robustly in message-passing systems
- The Weakest Failure Detector for Message Passing Set-Agreement
- The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
- The weakest failure detectors to solve certain fundamental problems in distributed computing
- Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
Cited in
(4)- Two-bit messages are sufficient to implement atomic read/write registers in crash-prone systems
- The weakest failure detector to implement a register in asynchronous systems with hybrid communication
- Anonymous asynchronous systems: the case of failure detectors
- What can be computed in a distributed system?
This page was built for publication: A simple proof of the necessity of the failure detector \(\Sigma \) to implement an atomic register in asynchronous message-passing systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q990136)