Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis

DOI10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002zbMath1194.91138MaRDI QIDQ994061

Francisco J. André, Nicolás Porteiro, Paula González

Publication date: 17 September 2010

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002

zbMATH Keywords

prisoner's dilemma; environmental regulation; vertical differentiation; environmental quality; Porter hypothesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B52: Special types of economic equilibria

91A80: Applications of game theory

91B76: Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)

91B54: Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand)

Related Items

The monopolist is not the best environmentalist's best friend: an example, Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management, Quality and entry deterrence

Cites Work

• Price competition, quality and income disparities
• Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy
• Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital
• Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling.
• Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis
• A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis.
• Growth, environment and innovation -- a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research
• On the existence of pure strategy Bertrand equilibrium
• Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis
• Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation