Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis

DOI10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002zbMath1194.91138OpenAlexW2026220339MaRDI QIDQ994061

Francisco J. André, Nicolás Porteiro, Paula González

Publication date: 17 September 2010

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002

zbMATH Keywords

prisoner's dilemmaenvironmental regulationvertical differentiationenvironmental qualityPorter hypothesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Special types of economic equilibria (91B52) Applications of game theory (91A80) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand) (91B54)

Related Items (3)

Quality and entry deterrence ⋮ The monopolist is not the best environmentalist's best friend: an example ⋮ Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management

Cites Work

• Price competition, quality and income disparities
• Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy
• Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital
• Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling.
• Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis
• A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis.
• Growth, environment and innovation -- a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research
• On the existence of pure strategy Bertrand equilibrium
• Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis
• Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation

This page was built for publication: Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis