Strategic quality competition and the Porter hypothesis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:994061
DOI10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002zbMath1194.91138MaRDI QIDQ994061
Francisco J. André, Nicolás Porteiro, Paula González
Publication date: 17 September 2010
Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.002
prisoner's dilemma; environmental regulation; vertical differentiation; environmental quality; Porter hypothesis
91B52: Special types of economic equilibria
91A80: Applications of game theory
91B76: Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.)
91B54: Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand)
Related Items
The monopolist is not the best environmentalist's best friend: an example, Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management, Quality and entry deterrence
Cites Work
- Price competition, quality and income disparities
- Taxing variable cost: Environmental regulation as industrial policy
- Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital
- Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling.
- Technical change, external economies, and the Porter hypothesis
- A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis.
- Growth, environment and innovation -- a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research
- On the existence of pure strategy Bertrand equilibrium
- Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis
- Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation