Rethinking the handling of method failure in comparison studies
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A comparison of hyperparameter tuning procedures for clinical prediction models: a simulation study
- Benchmarking local classification methods
- Design and analysis of experiments
- Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3860199 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2140075 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 795579 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inference for the generalization error
- Longitudinal data with follow-up truncated by death: match the analysis method to research aims
- Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with multiple thresholds: comparison of approaches in a simulation study
- Multilevel mixed effects parametric survival models using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature with application to recurrent events and individual participant data meta-analysis
- On estimating binomial response relations
- On the role of benchmarking data sets and simulations in method comparison studies
- Phases of methodological research in biostatistics -- building the evidence base for new methods
- Pitfalls and potentials in simulation studies: questionable research practices in comparative simulation studies allow for spurious claims of superiority of any method
- Prediction approaches for partly missing multi-omics covariate data: a literature review and an empirical comparison study
- The Elements of Statistical Learning
- THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES
- Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods
This page was built for publication: Rethinking the handling of method failure in comparison studies
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6883056)
