Scaling limit for a class of gradient fields with nonconvex potentials

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: We consider gradient fields (phix:xinmathbbZd) whose law takes the Gibbs--Boltzmann form Z−1exp−sum<x,y>V(phiy−phix), where the sum runs over nearest neighbors. We assume that the potential V admits the representation [V(eta):=-logintvarrho({d}kappa)exp�iggl[-{1/2}kappaet a^2�iggr],] where varrho is a positive measure with compact support in (0,infty). Hence, the potential V is symmetric, but nonconvex in general. While for strictly convex V's, the translation-invariant, ergodic gradient Gibbs measures are completely characterized by their tilt, a nonconvex potential as above may lead to several ergodic gradient Gibbs measures with zero tilt. Still, every ergodic, zero-tilt gradient Gibbs measure for the potential V above scales to a Gaussian free field.


The authors consider the scaling limit of gradient Gibbs measures (GGM) with non-convex potentials. While for stricly convex potentials, the translation-invariant, ergodic GGMs are completely characterized by their tilt, a non-convex potential may lead to several ergodic gradient measures with zero tilt [the first author and \textit{R. Kotecký}, Probab. Theory Related Fields 139, 1--39 (2007; Zbl 1120.82003)]. Here, the tilt represents the average incline of typical configurations. The main result of the paper is that every translation-invariant, ergodic GGM with zero tilt and a possibly non-convex potential of the form \[ V(\eta) = -\log \int \varrho(d\kappa) \exp\left[ -\frac{1}{2} \kappa \eta^2 \right] \] scales to a Gaussian free field. In the final section of the paper the authors discuss the open question of whether this result also holds for GGMs with non-zero tilt.



Cites work


Cited in
(28)








This page was built for publication: Scaling limit for a class of gradient fields with nonconvex potentials

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q624661)