Second-order languages and mathematical practice
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- Beyond first-order logic: the historical interplay between mathematical logic and axiomatic set theory
- Categoricity
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3882394 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3875222 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3788579 (Why is no real title available?)
- Which logic is the right logic?
Cited in
(14)- Toward a modal-structural interpretation of set theory
- A model for science kinematics
- IMPS: An interactive mathematical proof system
- Axiomatizations of arithmetic and the first-order/second-order divide
- The challenge of many logics: a new approach to evaluating the role of ideology in Quinean commitment
- Putnam and constructibility
- A critical appraisal of second-order logic
- The Significance of a Categoricity Theorem for Formal Theories and Informal Beliefs
- Putnam's constructivization argument
- Second-order arithmetic \textit{sans} sets
- What can a categoricity theorem tell us?
- A defense of second-order logic
- Mathematical practice: how an astronomical table was made in the \textit{Yuanjia li} (443 AD)
- Putnam's model-theoretic argument (meta)reconstructed. In the mirror of Carpintero's and van Douven's interpretations
This page was built for publication: Second-order languages and mathematical practice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3727947)