Security analysis of NIST key derivation using pseudorandom functions
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Cryptographic extraction and key derivation: the HKDF scheme
- Cryptographic treatment of key control security. In light of NIST SP 800-108
- Fast Software Encryption
- Full-state keyed duplex with built-in multi-user support
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1030977 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2009976 (Why is no real title available?)
- Improved security analysis for OMAC as a pseudorandom function
- Keying hash functions for message authentication
- New bounds for keyed sponges with extendable output: independence between capacity and message length
- New Proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security Without Collision-Resistance
- OMAC: one-key CBC MAC.
- On the Indifferentiability of the Sponge Construction
- Security of full-state keyed sponge and duplex: applications to authenticated encryption
- Security of Keyed Sponge Constructions Using a Modular Proof Approach
- Security reductions of the second round SHA-3 candidates
- The committing security of MACs with applications to generic composition
- The Security of Triple Encryption and a Framework for Code-Based Game-Playing Proofs
- To hash or not to hash again? (In)differentiability results for H^2 and HMAC
- Towards tight security bounds for \textsf{OMAC, XCBC} and \textsf{TMAC}
- When messages are keys: is HMAC a dual-PRF?
This page was built for publication: Security analysis of NIST key derivation using pseudorandom functions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7405015)
