Separating Without Any Ambiguity.
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A homomorphism theorem for finite semigroups
- A SURVEY ON SMALL FRAGMENTS OF FIRST-ORDER LOGIC OVER FINITE WORDS
- An explicit formula for the intersection of two polynomials of regular languages
- Classifying regular events in symbolic logic
- Equations Defining the Polynomial Closure of a Lattice of Regular Languages
- First-order logic with two variables and unary temporal logic
- Going Higher in the First-Order Quantifier Alternation Hierarchy on Words
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4035179 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3702106 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3495598 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1944133 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1775408 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6851910 (Why is no real title available?)
- Locally trivial categories and unambiguous concatenation
- On decidability of intermediate levels of concatenation hierarchies
- On the structure of semigroups
- Polynomial closure and unambiguous product
- Polynomial closure and unambiguous product
- Polynomial operations and hierarchies of concatenation
- Separating regular languages with two quantifiers alternations
- Separation for dot-depth two
- Sur le produit de concatenation non ambigu
- The dot-depth hierarchy, 45 years later
Cited in
(9)- Recognizing pro-\(\mathrm{R}\) closures of regular languages
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2080660 (Why is no real title available?)
- On All Things Star-Free
- How many times do you need to go back to the future in unary temporal logic?
- All about unambiguous polynomial closure
- The amazing mixed polynomial closure and its applications to two-variable first-order logic
- A generic characterization of generalized unary temporal logic and two-variable first-order logic
- Regular separators for VASS coverability languages
- Dot-depth three, return of the j-class
This page was built for publication: Separating Without Any Ambiguity.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5002824)