Separating weak partial square principles

DOI10.1016/J.APAL.2013.08.003MaRDI QIDQ386633zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors John Krueger, Ernest Schimmerling

Publication date 10 December 2013

Published in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2013.08.003

zbMATH Keywords

partial squaresquareweak partial squareweak square

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40) Large cardinals (03E55)

Recommendations

• Weak compactness and no partial squares
• The semi-weak square principle
• The weak □* is really weaker than the full □
• Partial square at \(\omega _1\) is implied by MM but not by PFA
• On the strengths and weaknesses of weak squares

Cites work

• A weak variation of shelah's I[ω₂]
• AN EQUICONSISTENCY RESULT ON PARTIAL SQUARES
• Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property
• Combinatorial principles in the core model for one Woodin cardinal
• 𝐼[𝜔₂] can be the nonstationary ideal on 𝐶𝑜𝑓(𝜔₁)
• Notes on singular cardinal combinatorics
• Reflecting stationary sets
• Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals
• Squares, scales and stationary reflection
• The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy

Cited in

(8)

• Indexed squares
• Square principles with tail-end agreement
• The weak square property
• Partial square at \(\omega _1\) is implied by MM but not by PFA
• Weak compactness and no partial squares
• A very weak square principle
• A finite family weak square principle
• On the strengths and weaknesses of weak squares

This page was built for publication: Separating weak partial square principles

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q386633)