Separation properties of theta functions

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: In a 1993 article, G. Faltings gave a new construction of the moduli space U of semistable vector bundles on a smooth curve X, avoiding geometric invariant theory. Roughly speaking, Faltings showed that the normalisation B of the ring A of theta functions (associated with vector bundles on X) suffices to realize U as a projective variety. Describing Faltings' work, C.S. Seshadri asked how close A is to B. In this article, we address this question from a geometric point of view. We consider the rational map, , and show that, not only is pi defined everywhere, but also pi is bijective, and is an isomorphism over the stable locus of U, if the characteristic of the ground field is 0. Moreover, we give a direct local construction of U as a fine moduli space, when the rank and degree are coprime, in any characteristic. The methods in the article apply to singular curves as well.


Let \(X\) be a non-singular connected projective curve over an algebraically closed field \(k\) and denote by \(U^s\) the set of isomorphism classes of stable vector bundles on \(X\) with given degree \(d\) and rank \(r\). We know, after \textit{C. S. Seshadri} and \textit{D. Mumford}, that \(U^s\) has a natural structure of quasi-projective variety, which can be compactified to a variety \(U\), by adding semistable vector bundles to the boundary. From a set-theoretical point of view \(U=R/G\), where \(R\) is a variety under the action of a reductive group \(G\), and the quotient is endowed with a scheme structure by techniques of geometric invariant theory (GIT for short). Without using GIT, \textit{G. Faltings} [J. Algebr. Geom. 2, 507-568 (1993; Zbl 0790.14019)] showed that \(R\) has enough theta functions to produce a \(G\)-invariant morphism \(\theta:R\to{\mathbb P}^N\), whose image is a closed subvariety \(U_\theta\), and \(\theta\) factors through a map \(\pi:U\to U_\theta\). In particular, there is a bijection between \(U\) and the normalization of \(U_\theta\), which induces a structure of projective variety on \(U\). This paper contains a partial answer to the question, raised by Seshadri, about how close is the normalization map \(\pi:U\to U_\theta\) to being an isomorphism. The author proves that the map \(\pi\) is bijective and is an isomorphism over \(U^s\).



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Separation properties of theta functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1974934)