rmBayes
Performing Bayesian Inference for Repeated-Measures Designs
Zhengxiao Wei, Michael E. J. Masson, Farouk S. Nathoo
Last update: 19 February 2024
Copyright license: GNU General Public License
Software version identifier: 0.1.15, 0.1.13, 0.1.14, 0.1.16
A Bayesian credible interval is interpreted with respect to posterior probability, and this interpretation is far more intuitive than that of a frequentist confidence interval. However, standard highest-density intervals can be wide due to between-subjects variability and tends to hide within-subject effects, rendering its relationship with the Bayes factor less clear in within-subject (repeated-measures) designs. This urgent issue can be addressed by using within-subject intervals in within-subject designs, which integrate four methods including the Wei-Nathoo-Masson (2023) <doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02295-1>, the Loftus-Masson (1994) <doi:10.3758/BF03210951>, the Nathoo-Kilshaw-Masson (2018) <doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.07.005>, and the Heck (2019) <doi:10.31234/osf.io/whp8t> interval estimates.
- Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
- A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs
- Accounting for Estimation Uncertainty and Shrinkage in Bayesian Within-Subject Intervals: A Comment on Nathoo, Kilshaw, and Masson (2018)
- Investigating the relationship between the Bayes factor and the separation of credible intervals
This page was built for software: rmBayes
